Phoenix Insurance Co. v. Bentley
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Judge.
This case should be decided by applying to its facts the pertinent policy provision: An insured is "any other person while using the automobile with the permission of the named insured, provided his actual use is within the scope of such permission.”
The various States take three views of this provision: (1) the liberal or "first instance permission” view, which says that if the initial use is with the permission of the named insured, then the permitee remains an insured throughout; (2) the strict view, which looks at the permission situation only at the time of the accident, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Holland v. Sanfax CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Hodges v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Ditmyer v. American Liberty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Drake v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dairyland Insurance Company v. Ann R. Makover, and Bernard Makover v. Robert Lawrence KnauerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Select Insurance v. RegisterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Kobetitsch v. American Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Mattison v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Combs v. Adair Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.