Legal Opinion
United States v. 20 Cases, More or Less
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided April 15, 1955No. 1642PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, Chief Judge.
An article of food labeled “Buitoni 20% Protein Spaghetti” was seized under 21 U.S.C. § 334(a). The libel charged the food was misbranded under 21 U. S.C. § 343(g) (1) as it “purported to be •and was represented as” a macaroni product, spaghetti, and failed to meet the definition and standard of identity established for that food by the apposite regulations. 1 Libellant charged “gum gluten” had been added to the spaghetti so that protein content exceeded 13% by weight, when the standard of identity limits maximum protein content to 13% by weight. 2 Claimant is Buitoni…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- 62 Cases of Jam v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Federal Security Administrator v. Quaker Oats Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Libby, McNeill & Libby v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- United States v. 30 Cases, More or Less, Leader Brand Strawberry Fruit SpreadDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. 354 BULK CARTONS, ETC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1959
- National Nutritional Foods Ass'n v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- National Nutritional Foods Association v. Food And Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- United States v. 20 Cases, More or Less, Each Containing 48 Packages of an Article Labelled in Part: (Pkg.) "Buitoni 20% Protein Spaghetti Net Wgt. 8 Oz."Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- People v. EndersCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.