Legal Opinion

In re W.Z.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 2011No. S-09-036PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Handwork, Judge.

{¶ 1} This is an appeal from a judgment issued by the Sandusky County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, finding appellant to be delinquent based upon charged offenses of rape that occurred when he was 14 and 15 years old. Because we conclude that R.C. 2152.86 is unconstitutional, we reverse and remand as to that part of the trial court’s judgment stating that appellant is automatically required to register as a sexual offender.

{¶2} In August 2009, appellant, W.Z., then 18 years old, was charged by indictment in the juvenile court with four counts of rape, in violation…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. Aalim (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. Aalim (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct. (Logan D.)Nevada Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API