Miami Conservancy District v. Baden
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION
By MATTHEWS, J.
I find myself unable to concur in either the reasoning of or the conclusion reached by the court.
Supplementing the express averments of the pleadings by conclusions of law and matters of which the court takes judicial notice, the case presented, which the majority of the court has concluded lacks essential elements for. the issuance of a writ of mandamus, is as follows:
Immediately following the disastrous fioed of 1913, the inhabitants of the Big Miami River Watershed petitioned the legislature for some authority to protect themselves against a recurrence of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Norris v. Montezuma Valley Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
- State ex rel. Soutter v. Common Council of the MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
- Francis v. A. T. & S. F. RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- State ex rel. Frazer v. Holt County CourtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
- Kadow v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.