Legal Opinion

Delray Lumber Co. v. Keohane

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1902No. Docket No. 99PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Donovan, J. Bill by the Delray Lumber Company and Joseph E. Hugg and Albert Oltz, copartners as Hugg & Oltz, against Katherine Keohane and James Scheel, to enforce mechanics’ liens. Erom a decree for complainants, defendant Keohane appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

This is a chancery suit to enforce two mechanics’ liens against the property of the first-named defendant. The first-named complainant claims a lien by reason of lumber furnished in the construction of a house for the defendant Keohane. The other two complainants are partners doing business under the firm name of Hugg & Oltz. They claim a lien for the balance unpaid on a contract to do the masonwork on said house, and for labor performed in lathing said house. The court below decreed the enforcement of these claims at their full amount. *19Defendant Keohane appeals. She claims that the decree…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smalley v. GearingMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Fairbairn v. MoodyMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. McMonegal v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Zilz v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Chapel State Theatre Co. v. HooperOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Kotcher v. PerrinMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Godfrey Lumber Co. v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Frohlich v. AshtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API