Manier v. Medtech Products, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
*1286ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY REMAND ORDER PENDING APPEAL [Dkt. No. 18.]
GONZALO P. CURIEL, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to stay remand order pending appeal. (Dkt. No. 18.) Plaintiffs filed an opposition and Defendants replied. (Dkt. Nos. 20, 21.) After a review of the briefing and applicable law, the Court DENIES Defendants’ motion to stay remand order pending appeal.
Procedural Background
Plaintiffs Sharon Manier, Teri Spano and Heather Stanfield (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed this putative class action alleging Defendants Medtech Products, Inc. and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Delores Lewis v. Verizon Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Leiva-Perez v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Golden Gate Restaurant Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
3Cited by8 opinions
- ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY v. STEPHENSONDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE v. ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- Hender v. American Directions WorkforceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Lacasse v. USANA Health Sciences, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Leroy v. HumeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.