Legal Opinion
Champlin Refining Co. v. Gasoline Products Co.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided November 30, 1928No. 2285PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
As amended, this was a suit at law to recover royalties amounting, with interest, to $103,004.35, admittedly due under a written contract for a nonexclusive license to use the patented Cross cracking process. The defendant (appellant) filed a counterclaim for damages, specified in detail, grounded on an alleged breach of a contemporaneous contract with plain-' tiff to construct a plant for, and to use, royalty free, the Cross vapor phase treating system. Evidence was received from defendant in support of this counterclaim; plaintiff offered no evidence in reply.
At the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Attleboro Mfg. Co. v. Frankfort Marine, Accident & Plate Glass Ins.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1917
- Union Pacific Railroad v. HuxollSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Morse v. MooreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1891
- Kingdom of Norway v. Federal Sugar Refining Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brewood v. CookCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
- Wisdom v. Guess Drycleaning Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1934
- First Nat. Bank of Indianola v. MaloneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1930
- Tulsa Rig, Reel & Mfg. Co. v. Cameron-Flint Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.