Legal Opinion
Matheson & Associates, PLLC v. Whitcomb Selinsky, PC
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided February 3, 2026No. 5:25-cv-00174Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:25-CV-174-BO-BM MATHESON & ASSOCIATES, PLLC, ) Plaintiff, V. ORDER WHITCOMB SELINSKY, PC, Defendant. ; This cause comes before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss [DE 10] for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2). Plaintiff has responded in opposition [DE 13] and defendant has replied [DE 14]. In this posture, the motion is ripe for ruling. For the following reasons, the motion is granted. BACKGROUND The parties are law firms both seeking to provide legal…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- David T. Combs Sarah E. Combs v. James O. Bakker Tammy Faye Bakker Richard DortchCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Carefirst of Maryland, Inc. v. Carefirst Pregnancy Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.