Cellnet Communications, Inc. v. New Par
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
GADOLA, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction. Plaintiff seeks to enjoin Defendants from terminating a contract and to require Defendants to provide service to Plaintiffs customers. A hearing was held on this motion on October 24, 2003. The Court concludes that irreparable injury will not occur in the absence of a preliminary injunction. The Court also concludes that, when balanced, the four factors used to evaluate a motion for a preliminary injunction do not warrant the issuance of an injunction.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Philip D. Overstreet v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Basicomputer Corp. v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Helen Jones v. City of Monroe, MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Eberspaecher North America, Inc. v. Van-Rob, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
- Automation & Modular Components, Inc. v. BlackfordDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
- DCJM, LP v. Aunt Bug's Cabin Rentals, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2024
- DG Smoky, LLC v. Aunt Bug's Cabin Rentals, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2024
- John Isham v. City of Belle Meade, ET AL.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2026