Legal Opinion

Cellnet Communications, Inc. v. New Par

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided November 13, 2003No. CIV. 03-40244PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

GADOLA, District Judge.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction. Plaintiff seeks to enjoin Defendants from terminating a contract and to require Defendants to provide service to Plaintiffs customers. A hearing was held on this motion on October 24, 2003. The Court concludes that irreparable injury will not occur in the absence of a preliminary injunction. The Court also concludes that, when balanced, the four factors used to evaluate a motion for a preliminary injunction do not warrant the issuance of an injunction.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Philip D. Overstreet v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  4. Basicomputer Corp. v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  5. Helen Jones v. City of Monroe, MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eberspaecher North America, Inc. v. Van-Rob, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
  2. Automation & Modular Components, Inc. v. BlackfordDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
  3. DCJM, LP v. Aunt Bug's Cabin Rentals, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2024
  4. DG Smoky, LLC v. Aunt Bug's Cabin Rentals, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2024
  5. John Isham v. City of Belle Meade, ET AL.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API