Legal Opinion

Maeser v. COOK, VOEGELE AND NELSON, PA

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 17, 1989No. C3-89-702PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARDEBRING, Judge.

Summary judgment was granted against Dean Maeser’s claim of legal malpractice. Maeser now appeals the trial court’s decision, contending that a question of material fact exists regarding the source of title to the real property at issue. We affirm.

FACTS

In 1943, William Driessen commenced an action to quiet title to property which he purchased from Charles and John Batchel-der. The action to determine adverse claims was brought to clarify a 1935 probate decree which conveyed title to the entire property to the Batchelders, with the exception of three acres — one acre…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Wichelman v. MessnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  4. Hubachek v. Maxbass Security BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  5. Padrnos v. City of NisswaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United Fire & Casualty Co. v. Fidelity Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  2. United Fire & Casualty Company v. Fidelity Title Insurance Company, Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation, United Fire & Casualty Company v. Fidelity Title Insurance Company, Lawyers Title Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API