Legal Opinion
United States v. Jon W. Osterlund
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 2, 1982No. 81-1383PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
The United States instituted this action for trespass against Jon W. Osterlund after it determined that his residence was situated on property within the boundaries of the Arapahoe-Roosevelt National Forest. After a hearing on the government’s motion for summary judgment, the district court entered judgment against Mr. Osterlund as a matter of law. 1 He was ordered to refrain from trespassing on national forest land. In addition, the government requested, and the district court granted relief in the form of a judgment requiring Mr. Osterlund to vacate the property and to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Kleppe v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Alabama v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. OsterlundDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mary P. Durham v. Xerox Corporation, a New York Corporation Doing Business in the State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Frank William RuckmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Double J. Land & Cattle Co. v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Gilpin Investment Co. v. BlakeColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
- Plotkin v. Club Valencia Condominium Ass'nColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.