Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Public Intervenor v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 10, 1993No. 91-2031Published

1DissentEich, C.J.

{.dissenting). The majority holds that the Department of Natural Resources lacked authority to adopt a rule providing a procedure for the department secretary's review of decisions by hearing examiners acting on the agency's behalf. I think that authority is found in sec. 227.46(3), Stats., which provides as follows:

227.46 Hearing examiners; examination of evidence by agency.(3) With respect to contested cases, an agency may by rule...:(a) Direct that the hearing examiner's decision be the final decision of the agency;(b) ... direct that the record be certified to it without an intervening…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District v. Wisconsin Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State Ex Rel. DeLuca v. Common CouncilWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Wisconsin Hospital Ass'n v. Natural Resources BoardCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
  5. Town of Two Rivers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API