Legal Opinion

Federal Trade Commission v. Sysco Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 12, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2015-0256PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Amit P. Mehta, United States District Judge

On February 23, 2015, the court entered a Protective Order Governing Confidential Material that places strict limits on who may receive documents designated as “Confidential Material.” ECF # 25 (“Protective Order”).’ As presently drawn, the Protective Order does not grant access to Confidential Material to' officers and employees of Defendants Sysco Corp. (“Sys-co”), USF Holding Corp., and U.S. Foods, Inc. (collectively “US Foods”). Id. ¶ 7.

Defendants have moved to modify the Protective Order to permit certain members of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. U.S. Steel Corporation v. The United States and U.S. International Trade Commission, and Cosipa, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  3. Carpenter Technology Corp. v. Armco, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Advocate Health Care NetworkDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  2. Silversun Indus., Inc. v. PPG Indus., Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
  3. DeCurtis LLC v. Carnival CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2021
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. IQVIA Holdings Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2023
  5. Federal Trade Commission v. Peabody Energy CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API