Legal Opinion
Ruppert v. Alliant Energy Cash Balance Pension Plan
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided June 3, 2010No. 3:08-mj-00127PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge.
In this class action brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461, plaintiffs contend that defendant Affiant Energy Cash Balance Pension Plan underpaid them when it calculated the lump sum distributions of their retirement benefits. Now before the court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment, defendant’s motion for leave to file a surreply and plaintiffs’ motions to exclude certain portions of the reports and testimony of defendant’s experts.
Understanding the parties’ arguments…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Joseph F. Cada v. Baxter Healthcare CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- John Doe v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin and Aurora Health Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Federal Housing Finance Agency v. Nomura Holding America, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Thompson v. Retirement Plan for Employees of S.C. Johnson & Sons, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2010