Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bertram v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided January 30, 2004No. CR-00-2277Published

1ConcurrenceWise, Judge

I reluctantly concur with the main opinion’s reversal of Patricia Norman Bertram’s felony conviction for driving while under the influence of alcohol, as ordered by the Alabama Supreme Court. However, I write to express my agreement with the following language from Justice *897Stuart’s dissent in Ex parte Bertram, 884 So.2d 889 (Ala.2003):

“The Legislature’s intent in creating the offense of driving under the influence of alcohol or a controlled substance is clear and unambiguous. This State has a valid interest in deterring conduct that risks the safety and lives of its citizens. Individuals who…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. City of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  2. Ex Parte BertramSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. Ex Parte ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  4. State v. ReaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API