Copeland v. Hemingway
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Alvis Copeland, Jr., a pro se federal prisoner, appeals a district court judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
In 1994, a jury convicted Copeland of conspiring to distribute powder cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and acquitted Copeland of distributing cocaine base (crack). This court affirmed his conviction, but…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- James Charles, (98-5747), Movant (98-0539) v. Ernest v. Chandler, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Borden v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2021
- Brooks v. Warden FCI AshlandDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2023
- Bryson v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
- Busch v. QuintanaDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2021
- Cardona v. JoynerDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.