Legal Opinion

Copeland v. Hemingway

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 21, 2002No. 01-2255PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Alvis Copeland, Jr., a pro se federal prisoner, appeals a district court judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

In 1994, a jury convicted Copeland of conspiring to distribute powder cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and acquitted Copeland of distributing cocaine base (crack). This court affirmed his conviction, but…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. James Charles, (98-5747), Movant (98-0539) v. Ernest v. Chandler, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  5. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Borden v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2021
  2. Brooks v. Warden FCI AshlandDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2023
  3. Bryson v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
  4. Busch v. QuintanaDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2021
  5. Cardona v. JoynerDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API