Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Chicago v. Hart

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1943No. 27003. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Stone

The plaintiff, as trustee of a trust fund created for the benefit of the grandchildren of Max Hart, deceased, sued to recover from defendants as contribution, the difference in amount of inheritance tax nominally assessed against the interests represented by the plaintiff and the amount charged against such interest in final distribution of the estate of Max Hart.

The circuit court of Cook county rendered judgment against each of defendants Abraham S. Hart and Maxine Hart Spitz in the sum of $14,864.47, being one half of the sum of $23,306.66, the difference found by the court to be due…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Riggs v. Del DragoSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Young Men's Christian Assn. of Columbus v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. People v. PasfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  4. The People v. McCormickIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  5. People v. Union Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Uihlein v. UihleinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Roe v. Estate of FarrellIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. T. S. Ballance, Administrator De Bonis Non With the Will Annexed of the Estate of Samuel D. Jarvis, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
  4. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Roy B. Thompson, Jr., of the Will of Roy B. Thompson, Deceased v. Earl R. Wiseman, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API