Legal Opinion

Montana Ore Purchasing Co. v. Lindsay

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1901No. 1,639PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Peremptory mandamus by tbe Montana Oie Purchasing Company and others against John Lindsay, as Judge of the Second Judicial District Court of the State of Montana. Motion to quash alternative writ granted, and demurrer to application for peremptory writ sustained.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pigott

Mandamus. The object of this proceeding is to obtain a peremptory writ commanding John Lindsay, Esquire, late one of . the judges of the district court of Silver Bow county, to amend a bill of exceptions settled and signed by him while judge. Eor the purposes of the present motion and demurrer the allegations of the affidavit filed in support of the application must be taken as true. Succinctly stated the facts are these: In an action between the Boston and Montana Consolidated Copper and Silver Mining Company and the relators or plaintiffs herein, rvhich was pending in the court over which…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Whiteside v. First Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Stackpole v. HallahanMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Tarver v. Comm'rs' Ct.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1850
  4. Raleigh v. First Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. First National Bank v. NeillMontana Supreme Court · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Rowe v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  2. State Ex Rel. Griffin v. GreeneMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Hansen v. City of HavreMontana Supreme Court · 1941
  4. State ex rel. Stiefel v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1908
  5. State ex rel. Gravely v. StewartMontana Supreme Court · 1913

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API