Legal Opinion

Marcroft v. Labor Commission

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided July 16, 2015No. 20140241-CAPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Decision

ORME, Judge:

T1 Robert Mareroft challenges the order of the Utah Labor Commission Appeals Board, which modified an Administrative Law Judge's decision. Because Marcroft did not preserve his challenge, as he candidly concedes in his reply brief, we uphold the Board's order without reaching the merits of Mareroft's claim.

T2 In 2012, Mareroft was injured on the job when he was hit by a car. He sought . and received worker's compensation benefits. Before the Administrative Law Judge entered her decision, Mareroft and Respondents entered into a stipulation that payments from the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coleman Ex Rel. Schefski v. StevensUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Boyle v. ChristensenUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  4. Boyle v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009
  5. State v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. True v. Utah Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  2. State v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
  3. In re Evan O. KollerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  4. Bear v. Lifemap AssuranceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  5. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API