Legal Opinion

Christiana Care Health Services v. Palomino

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided April 11, 2013No. Nos. 56, 2012, 62, 2012, 63, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIDGELY, Justice,

for the majority.

Cecil Palomino, Salvador Avila-Hernandez and Julio Munoz (“Claimants”) were each injured in different work-related accidents. It is not disputed that their injuries are compensable under the Worker’s Compensation Act and that payments of some worker’s compensation have been made. After their doctors recommended certain treatments, their employers requested determinations of whether the treatment plans fell outside of the Health Care Practice (“HCAP”) Guidelines through a utilization review (“UR”) authorized by 19 Del. C. § 2322F(j). The UR panel determined…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. LeVan v. Independence Mall, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  2. Standard Distributing, Inc. v. HallSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  3. National Union Fire Insurance v. McDougallSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. Bunting & Murray Construction.Superior Court of Delaware · 2015
  2. Nieves v. This and That Services Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API