Legal Opinion

In re Boileau

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 27, 1984No. 83-6259PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TANG, Circuit Judge:

This is a section 1292(b) interlocutory appeal from an order of the district court affirming the bankruptcy judge’s ruling granting a motion by the court-appointed examiner to compel the production of certain documents claimed to be protected by the attorney-client privilege. We affirm. FACTS

The present appeal arises from bankruptcy proceedings initiated on June 21, 1982, by the filing of an involuntary petition for relief under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code against Paul J. Boileau (“debtor”), doing business as Boileau & Johnson. On July 13, 1982, the bankruptcy court…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. In the Matter of Elaine B. Fischel, Contemner-Appellant. United States of America v. Harry MargolisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  4. In Re Featherworks Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1982
  5. Ex Parte FullerSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Hewes v. LangstonMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Hodges, Grant & Kaufmann v. United States GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  4. In the Matter of Gaslight Club, Inc., Debtors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  5. In Re United Press International, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API