Legal Opinion
Conte v. Meyer
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided October 17, 1994No. 94SA332PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kirshbaum
This appeal requires determination of whether appellant, Joanne Conte, has sufficiently satisfied applicable statutory requirements to render her eligible as a candidate for the office of Colorado State Representative for House District 29 in Arvada, Colorado. Appellee, Colorado Secretary of State Natalie Meyer (the Secretary), determined that Conte was ineligible to seek the position. Conte and appellants Elaine Boese, Raymond Smith, and Shirley Pater filed a civil action pursuant to section 1-1-113, IB C.R.S. (1994 Supp.), seeking a declaration that the Secretary’s determination was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Farmers Group, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Ingram v. CooperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- City of Ouray v. OlinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Snyder Oil Co. v. EmbreeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Colo. Dept. of Soc. Serv. v. BD. OF CTY. COM'RSSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- AviComm, Inc. v. Colorado Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Bill Boom Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Showpiece Homes Corp. v. Assurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- McClellan v. MeyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Colby Ex Rel. Colby v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.