Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ramsey

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 11, 1982No. 1038PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s Post Conviction Hearing Act (PCHA) petition. Appellant contends that his PCHA counsel was ineffective in failing to call trial counsel as a witness and in failing to produce evidence to support the petition. Because the record is insufficient to determine the merits of these contentions, we must vacate the order of the lower court in part, and remand for an evidentiary hearing.

Appellant was convicted in a nonjury trial of conspiracy and five counts of robbery. On direct appeal, he alleged several instances of trial counsel’s incompetence. We…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Commonwealth v. RamseySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. SweitzerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. HenkelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. HartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. DerkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Commonwealth v. FordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API