For-Shor Co. v. Early
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORME, Judge:
Labor Services, Inc. (LSI) appeals from the trial court’s denial of its motion to intervene. On appeal, LSI claims the trial court erred in ruling that its action to foreclose its mechanic’s lien was not filed within the period set forth in Utah Code Ann. § 38-1-11 (1988). We hold that the action to foreclose the mechanic’s lien was timely commenced. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
FACTS
Appellee David Early engaged Savage Construction as the general contractor for construction on Early’s residence. The contract stated that the property on which…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- AAA Fencing Co. v. Raintree Development & Energy Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1986
- Projects Unlimited, Inc. v. Copper State Thrift & Loan Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
- Govert Copier Painting v. Van LeeuwenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
- Holbrook v. Webster's Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1958
- Mickelsen v. Craigco, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Richards v. Security Pacific National BankCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
- J v. Hatch Construction, Inc. v. KamprosCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
- Sill v. HartCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005