Legal Opinion

White v. GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 8, 2010No. 4-09-0036PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Steigmann

This case presents the question of whether Supreme Court Rule 237(b) (210 Ill. 2d R. 237(b)), dealing with persons whom a party may be required to produce at trial, includes not only persons who are “officer[s], director[s], or employee[s,]” but also those persons who are under a party’s control. We hold that it does not.

I. PROLOGUE

During an October 2008 wrongful-death jury trial based upon asbestos exposure (which was the second jury trial in this case), the trial court sanctioned defendant, Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC, pursuant to Rule 237(b) (210 Ill. 2d R. 237(b)) for failing to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of RennickIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. HudsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Nolan v. Weil-McLainIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Rath v. Carbondale Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  5. White v. Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Estate of HoogerwerfAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  2. White v. GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API