Legal Opinion

People v. Eagen

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 7, 1984No. Docket 68656PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Following a nonjury trial, defendant was convicted of second-degree murder, MCL 750.317: MSA 28.549. He was sentenced to a prison term of from 10 to 25 years. He appeals as of right.

On appeal, defendant first claims that the trial judge’s findings of fact were inadequate. Specifically, defendant claims that the judge failed to articulate the facts necessary to resolve defendant’s claims of intoxication and provocation.

Defendant claims that he was too intoxicated to have formed the specific intent to commit murder at the time he killed his victim. We find, contrary to defendant’s claim, that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. GarciaMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. CrittleMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  3. People v. SavoieMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  4. People v. PecoraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  5. People v. MillerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. CoonsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. RashidMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. FlemingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Babcock v. GoldDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1990
  5. Collazo v. Otsego CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API