Legal Opinion

Wiley v. Hope

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 26, 1975PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

Pursuant to subdivision A of rule 16 of its Standing Rules, the Rensselaer County Legislature (hereinafter, Legislature) designates its adopted resolutions as being either “General” or “Parliamentary”. A “General” resolution, indicated by the prefix letter “G” before its number, is subject to the approval of the County Executive while a "Parliamentary” resolution, indicated by the prefix letter "P” before its number, is not subject to executive approval and relates to rules and regulations or other matters pertaining solely to the conduct of the Legislature’s own procedures.

In both of these…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smiley v. HolmSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Park Avenue Clinical Hospital v. KramerNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Park Avenue Clinical Hospital v. KramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Monahan v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. In re County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. In re County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  4. Smith v. BuonoNew York Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API