Legal Opinion

Vanvooren v. Astin

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 2005No. 30628PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Justice.

Rick and Danika VanVooren appeal from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the respondent health care providers. The court held that I.C. § 5-334, which prohibits wrongful birth claims, barred the VanVoorens’ claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress. Dr. Smith, one of the providers, cross-appealed, arguing the district court abused its discretion in denying his request for attorney fees. Both parties seek attorney fees on appeal. We affirm the district court’s orders and decline to award fees on appeal.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Blake v. CruzIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Durrant v. ChristensenIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Gardner v. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Beco Construction Co. v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Watson v. WeickIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Esser Electric v. Lost River Ballistics Technologies, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Conner v. HodgesIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Mickelsen Construction, Inc. v. HorrocksIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Skinner v. U.S. Bank Home MortgageIdaho Supreme Court · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API