Granados Navedo v. Acevedo
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
FUSTE, District Judge.
Last December, pursuant to the doctrine set forth in Railroad Commission of Texas v. Pullman Co., 312 U.S. 496, 61 S.Ct. 643, 85 L.Ed. 971 (1941), we abstained from exercising jurisdiction over this case pending a determination of novel questions of local law by the courts of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. See Granados-Navedo v. Acevedo, 703 F.Supp. 170 (D.P.R. 1988). The local action is still pending, and plaintiffs now move that we lift the order of abstention and resume jurisdiction. A hearing on this question was held on July 26, 1989.
Our reasons for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Harris County Commissioners Court v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Anderson v. BabbCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
- Thomas E. Lister v. Patrick J. LuceyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Granados-Navedo v. AcevedoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1988
3Cited by1 opinion
- Navedo v. AcevedoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1990