Legal Opinion

In Re RK

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 2002No. 20020013Published

1Opinion of the Court

646 N.W.2d 699 (2002)

2002 ND 111

In the Interest of R.K., a child.

Vince Ament, Petitioner,

v.

R.K. (Child), M.R. (Mother), Respondents,

D.K. (Father), Respondent and Appellant, and

M.R. and P.R. (Grandparents), Intervenors and Appellees.

No. 20020013.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

July 11, 2002.

Rhonda R. Ehlis (on brief), Hardy, Maus & Nordsven, P.C., Dickinson, for respondent and appellant.

Cynthia G. Schaar (on brief), Merrick & Schaar Law Firm, Jamestown, for intervenors and appellees.

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] D.K. ("Don")[1] appealed from a juvenile court order, entered December 12, 2001, placing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hust v. HustNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Botnen v. LukensNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Eastburn v. B.E.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Hamers v. GuttormsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Novak v. J.L.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API