Worldwide Equipment of TN, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
This case presents the question of what one must do in order to sue for the refund of a tax that someone else paid. Worldwide Equipment, Inc. remitted a 12% federal excise tax collected from purchasers of its heavy duty trucks, and sought a refund from the United States, claiming that the trucks qualified as exempted, “off-highway” vehicles under 26 U.S.C. § 7701(a)(48). The refund statute for such a case, 26 U.S.C. § 6416(a), requires a refund claimant to show that it has made arrangement to avoid double payments by, as relevant to this case, submitting written…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. Felt & Tarrant Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Allstates Refractory Contractors v. Julie SuCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- Benjamin Shawler and Courtney Shriver v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
- Charles v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
- Wyandot, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022