Legal Opinion

ACS State Healthcare, LLC, and Conduent State Healthcare, LLC v. M&M Orthodontics, PA Dr. Scott Malone, DDS And Dr. Diana Malone, DDS

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided August 15, 2024No. 03-23-00294-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-23-00294-CV ACS State Healthcare, LLC, and Conduent State Healthcare, LLC, Appellants v. M&M Orthodontics, PA; Dr. Scott Malone, DDS; and Dr. Diana Malone, DDS, Appellees FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-GN-14-000321, THE HONORABLE MAYA GUERRA GAMBLE, JUDGE PRESIDING DISSENTING OPINION Absent an express grant of authority, this Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction to consider an appeal from an interlocutory order. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 & n.12 (Tex. 2001) (citing Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. University of the Incarnate Word v. RedusTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Gonzalez v. Heard, Goggan, Blair & Williams, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996
  5. Gtech Corp. v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API