Legal Opinion

Barrett v. Bartlett

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1937No. 26486. Department TwoPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

Defendants, being the owners of a lot in Port Orchard, by contract dated February 24, 1936, agreed to sell the same to plaintiff for $2,200, the contract acknowledging the receipt of seven hundred dollars, and plaintiff agreeing to pay the balance in monthly installments of twenty dollars each, commencing March 24, 1936, interest on the unpaid balances at the rate of six per cent per annum also to be paid monthly. The purchaser (plaintiff) resided in Montana, and immediately upon the execution of the contract, listed the property for sale or exchange with an agent residing in Port Orchard.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Benedict v. LynchNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
  2. Sleeper v. BragdonWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Benham v. Columbia Canal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Kiefer v. Carter Contracting & Hauling Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Smith v. BarberWashington Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dill v. ZielkeWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Williams v. DeLayAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Sofie v. KaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  4. Knoblauch v. SanstromWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Brummett v. SandoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API