Legal Opinion

Federal Trade Commission v. Rag-Stiftung

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 3, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2019-2337Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 19-2337 (TJK) v. RAG-STIFTUNG et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is a veritable swiss army knife of chemicals. Often an environmentally friendly alternative to other substances, it bleaches paper, treats wastewater, disinfects knee scrapes, fuels rockets, and plays a role in manufacturing semiconductors, to name a few of its myriad applications. In November 2018, two of the five North American suppliers of hydrogen peroxide, Evonik and PeroxyChem,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Rose v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Tampa Electric Co. v. Nashville Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API