Legal Opinion

Hall v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 28, 1930No. 27,690PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

As executor of the estate of Mary Kaer, deceased, plaintiff sues defendant for the recovery of the amount of a joint deposit standing, at the time of her death, to the credit of the deceased and defendant in the Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank of Minneapolis. Defendant later withdrew the deposit. After a verdict for defendant, plaintiff appeals from the order denying his alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

The issue is simple. The evidence for plaintiff, consisting mostly of alleged admissions of' defendant against interest, well supports the theory…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dyste v. Farmers & Mechanics Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  2. McLeod v. Hennepin County Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. Gracz v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Zigan v. LeblancSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  2. Sathrum v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. Erickson v. KalmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  4. Kempf v. KempfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  5. Erickson v. KalmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API