Erickson v. Kalman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Knutson, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from an order of the District Court of Hennepin County denying plaintiff’s motion for amended findings or, in the alternative, for a new trial. Plaintiff, as administrator of the estate of Ruth Erickson, his wife, had claimed a half interest in certain savings accounts which his wife had held in nominal joint tenancy with her mother and her sister, the defendant herein. The essential facts of the matter are as follows:
In 1951, Huida E. Dahlroos, mother of Ruth Erickson and Irma V. Kalman, had savings accounts in Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Park Enterprises, Inc. v. TrachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Dyste v. Farmers & Mechanics Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- In Re Estate of JeruzalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Rutchick v. SaluteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Brennan v. CarrollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- O'Hair v. O'HairArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- Enright v. LehmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Erickson v. KalmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- In Re Estate of ButlerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re Estate of ButlerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.