Legal Opinion
Hoenig Developments, Inc. v. Dial Industries, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 29, 2016No. Case No. 13-CV-15138Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REGARDING THE PARTIES’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Doc. Nos. 54, 55]
Denise Page Hood, Chief Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
On December 18, 2013, Plaintiffs Hoenig Developments, Inc. (“Hoenig, Inc.”) and Hoenig Developments, LLC (“Hoenig, LLC”) filed a five-count Complaint against Defendant. The Complaint included the following claims: (1) Count I—Trademark Infringement Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a); (2) Count II—Breach of Contract; (3) Count III—Quantum Meruit/Un-just Enrichment; (4) Count IV—Cancellation of Trademark; and, (5) Count V— Request for Accounting. On January 21, 2016, Defendant…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Homeowners Group, Inc. v. Home Marketing Specialists, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.