Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Luzaich v. Catalano

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 5, 1975No. Civ. A. No. 74-78PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM and ORDER

McCUNE, District Judge.

The issue presented by this petition for writ of habeas corpus is whether as a matter of federal constitutional law a defendant in a state criminal proceeding was denied due process of law by the refusal of a state trial judge to have the closing argument of the prosecutor stenographically recorded upon request of defense counsel. As phrased in the petition before us: Does the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution require that closing arguments of counsel be stenographically or mechanically recorded, upon request, so that a criminal defendant will…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. ReynoldsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API