Vandevender v. Thierolf
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.
Plaintiffs brought this legal malpractice action against defendant, an attorney who had represented them in a livestock dispute. The trial court entered a directed verdict in defendant’s favor. We affirm.
Because this case arises on defendant’s motion for directed verdict, we set out the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiffs. Metropolitan Property & Casualty v. Harper, 168 Or App 358, 367, 7 P3d 541 (2000). Plaintiffs raised cattle in Jackson County. In December 1992, plaintiffs took out a loan from the United States National Bank so that they could increase their herd. To get the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Metropolitan Property & Casualty v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Hunter v. Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Butler v. VanagasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Safeco Insurance v. LaskeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999