Legal Opinion

Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Rowland

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided December 19, 1932PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSenter, J.

This is a suit for damages brought by plaintiff below (Mrs. H. E. Rowland who will hereinafter be referred to as plaintiff) against the Coca-Cola Bottling Company (who will hereinafter be referred to as defendant).

The declaration alleges in substance that the defendant is engaged in bottling Coca-Cola at its plant in Memphis; that on or about March 5, 1930, the defendant wrongfully and negligently sealed up in a bottle of Coca-Cola a decomposed mouse or rat, and permitted said bottle to be sent out to the trade, and in the regular course of its business to be sold and consumed by some one as…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Springs v. . DollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Wilson v. Colonial Air Transport, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Brenizer v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis RailwayTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Olson v. Whitthorne & SwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Carter Oil Co. v. Independent Torpedo Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. BunceWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Bowers v. PottsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
  3. Winfree v. Coca-Cola Bottling Works of LebanonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1935
  4. Ford v. Roddy Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
  5. Hoback v. Coca Cola Bottling WorksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API