Legal Opinion
Ashford v. Culver City Unified School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 16, 2005No. B176293PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, Acting P. J.
In this employee termination administrative mandamus case (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5), 1 the petitioner, Daniel Ashford (petitioner), a former employee of the Culver City Unified School District (the District), appeals from the trial court’s judgment. That judgment ordered the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandate, directed to the Board- of Education of the Culver City Unified School District (the Board). 2 It commanded the Board to set aside its decision that there was cause for termination of petitioner’s employment, hold a new administrative hearing for the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Morrison v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Fascination, Inc. v. HooverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- La Prade v. Department of Water & PowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Lacy v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Voices of the Wetlands v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Millview County Water District v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. KhaledAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2010
- Voices of Wetlands v. STATE WATER RES. BD.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Voices of the Wetlands v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.