Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Ryall

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 18, 1984No. Civ. 7389PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANSON (P. D.), J.

In this appeal from a judgment entered in an action brought under the Revised Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (RURESA) in Kern County Superior Court, the sole question presented is whether the trial court had jurisdiction to make orders concerning visitation and a tax deduction in a RURESA proceeding.

Facts

Linda Susan and Charles Ryall were married in Florida. Two children were born to the marriage and the parties were divorced. Included in the Florida dissolution order was a property settlement agreement and an agreement concerning custody of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. DeFunis v. OdegaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Gordon v. Justice CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Worthley v. WorthleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Moffat v. MoffatCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Titchenal v. DexterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  2. In Re Marriage of ComerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Taravella v. StanleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  4. Bear v. ZubatyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  5. Hoyle v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API