Loudres v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DALLY, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for capital murder. The punishment is death.
The appellant contends that certain prospective jurors were improperly excused. We agree: the rationale of the decisions of the Supreme Court in Adams v. Texas, 448 U.S. 38, 100 S.Ct. 2521, 65 L.Ed.2d 581 (1980) and Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510, 88 S.Ct. 1770, 20 L.Ed.2d 776 (1968), requires the reversal of the judgment in this case.
In Witherspoon v. Illinois, supra, the United States Supreme Court stated:
“... we hold that a sentence of death cannot be carried out if the jury that…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Adams v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Boulden v. HolmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Davis v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- O'Pry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Graham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Ex Parte BravoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Perillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.