Legal Opinion

Carmona v. WAL-MART STORES, EAST, LP

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 18, 2011No. 2D11-2695PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KHOUZAM, Judge.

Osanna S. and Nelson L. Carmona, proceeding pro se, appeal the denial of their motion for relief from judgment after summary judgment was granted in Wal-Mart’s favor. They argue that they were denied procedural due process at the summary judgment hearing because they did not receive a meaningful opportunity to be heard. Because the Carmonas were given both proper notice and a full and fair chance to argue their case, their rights to procedural due process were not violated and we affirm.

On April 29, 2009, Mrs. Carmona was shopping at a Wal-Mart store in Cape Coral. A Wal-Mart…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Gilbert v. HomarSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Department of Law Enf. v. Real PropertySupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  4. Hadley v. Department of AdministrationSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  5. NC v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Austin v. AustinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  2. Bull Motors, LLC v. BrownDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  3. Casteel v. MaddalenaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  4. Gulf Eagle, LLC v. Park East Development, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  5. Trans Health Management Inc. v. NunziataDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API