State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Coviello
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
VANASKIE, Chief Judge.
On April 12, 1999, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) filed a complaint in this Court seeking a declaration that Leonard and Mary Coviello were not entitled to under-insured motorist coverage under their daughter’s State Farm policy. State Farm contends that, because at the time of their accident the Coviellos were occupying their own car, and not their daughter’s, coverage is barred, by a “family vehicle exclusion” in the State Farm policy. On April 13, 2001, the Coviellos filed a motion for summary judgment, asserting that…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Aloe Coal Company and Commercial Union Insurance Company v. Clark Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Eichelman v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Wolgemuth v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Windrim v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.