Legal Opinion

D'Alessandro v. Barfield

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 29, 1943No. Appeals, 189 and 190PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Maxey,

This appeal is from the refusal of the court below to enter judgment for the defendant non obstante veredicto.

Plaintiffs’ action in trespass was brought against the defendants Barfield and Fisher, trading as Wissahickon Dairies, and one John J. Coyle, for the recovery of damages for personal injuries sustained by the minor plaintiff in a collision between two motor trucks owned by the respective defendants. The jury rendered verdicts only against the partnership, the Wissahickon Dairies, in the amount of $11,000 for the minor plaintiff and $1795.00 for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rich Hill Coal Company v. BashoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Qualp v. James Stewart Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Gallivan v. Wark Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. De Nardo Et Ux. v. Seven Baker Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. William J. Hayes v. Philadelphia Transportation Company, Delaware Valley Steel Fabricators, Inc., and A. Belanger & Sons, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
  2. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Harry W. Boettger v. The Babcock & Wilcox CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
  4. Perma-Lite of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Fishel v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API