Legal Opinion

United States v. Charles Perkins

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 25, 2014No. 13-30254UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Charles Glenn Perkins appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence and alternative request for a hearing under Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978). We conclude that the district court erred in not granting Perkins a Franks hearing. We do not reach his motion to suppress.

“A defendant is entitled to a Franks hearing only if he makes ... ‘a substantial preliminary showing that the affidavit contained] intentionálly or recklessly false statements, and ... [that] the affidavit purged of its falsities would not be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. Stanley Mills StanertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Justin Barrett HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. Joseph MelingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Charles PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. Charles PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. Charles PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API