United States v. Charles Perkins
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Charles Glenn Perkins appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence and alternative request for a hearing under Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978). We conclude that the district court erred in not granting Perkins a Franks hearing. We do not reach his motion to suppress.
“A defendant is entitled to a Franks hearing only if he makes ... ‘a substantial preliminary showing that the affidavit contained] intentionálly or recklessly false statements, and ... [that] the affidavit purged of its falsities would not be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Stanley Mills StanertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Justin Barrett HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Joseph MelingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Charles PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Charles PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Charles PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017