Legal Opinion
People v. Doyle
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 14, 1987PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*339OPINION OF THE COURT
Alan D. Marrus, J.
The defendant has moved to suppress testimony identifying him as the perpetrator of the crime on the ground that he "was subjected to an impermissibly suggestive corporeal identification procedure” which was "so conducive to an irreparable mistaken identification as to be a denial of due process of law”. The People respond that the identification testimony in this case involves two confirmatory viewings by an undercover police officer which are "not identification procedures within the ambit of Wade and its progeny”. The issue to be decided is whether the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. GissendannerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. MoralesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. RolisonNew York Supreme Court · 1988
- In re F.G.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Matter of FgDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. Evans, New York County Courts1990