Legal Opinion

People v. Evans

New York County Courts

Decided January 19, 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Jack Mackston, J.

The People’s application to withdraw their consent to a Wade hearing is granted, and defendant’s request to suppress *484identification testimony, pursuant to CPL 710.30, is denied without a hearing on the grounds that the photopak viewing was a confirmatory procedure.

BACKGROUND

On the day scheduled for a Wade hearing, the People, in open court, moved to withdraw their prior stipulated consent to a hearing claiming that the eyewitness knew defendant and therefore the photopak display was merely confirmatory. Defendant objected contending he was, in any event,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. GissendannerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. People v. WhartonNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. People v. TasNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. BeauchampNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. People v. Roberto H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API