Legal Opinion

United States v. Phelps Dodge Industries, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 14, 1984No. 78 Civ. 4479 (ADS)PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORRECTED OPINION AND ORDER

SOFAER, District Judge:

The United States brought this civil action in September 1978 for monetary penalties and injunctive relief, pursuant to section 5(1) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(l), against defendants Phelps Dodge Industries, Inc., a successor to Phelps Dodge Copper Products Corporation; General Cable Corporation, now known as GK Technologies, Inc. (“GK”); the Okonite Company; and the Anaconda Company. The complaint charges that the defendants violated a 1936 Federal Trade Commission cease-and-desist order (“the Order”), which…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kimmelman v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. Reserve Supply Corporation v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation and Certainteed CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. Fall River Motor Sales, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  4. United States (EPA) v. Environmental Waste Control, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1989
  5. In Re NASDAQ Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API